SELF ASSESSMENT

Research and planning- 15/20
WWW- Researching films to do with my genre
EBI- I took media more seriously from the beggining of the year

Construction- 40/60
WWW- Editting
EBI- We had longer time to develop our opening sequence even more

Evaluation- 5/20
WWW- The technologies tutorials
EBI- If we started to do the evaluation earliar

TOTAL MARK 60/100 (for a C grade)


Marian 80/100
Effort- Level 4
WWW- She was a good team member and editted extremely well
EBI-

Peggy /100
Effort- Level 3
WWW- She done the music good
EBI- She came to film on time

Final opening sequence:

Year 12 Media Peer Assessment of Construction
My group done these together

Group 3: Samantha, Peggy, Marina



What was level 4 quality (excellent)?
- Variety of shots
- Transitions
- Sound


What was level 3 quality (proficient)?
- Holding a steady shot
- Variety of shots
- Editting

What was level 2 quality (basic)?
- Shooting material
- Mise-en-scene
- Titles

What was level 1 quality (minimal)?
-
- n/a
-

General comments of what I really liked about this opening sequence are:
I think as a group we made the idea better since the first draft of the opening sequence

General comments of what I thought could be improved about this opening sequence are:
To re do the walking scene and edit it to be faster

Overall, I would give this group level 3 because most of their work from the syllabus is within the level 3 bracket.

Overall, I would give this group a mark of 3

Year 12 Media Peer Assessment of Construction
My group done these together

Group 1:Marina, Difya, Tracy



What was level 4 quality (excellent)?
- Framing a shot
- Edits
- Transition


What was level 3 quality (proficient)?
- Sound
- Holding a steady shot
- Variety of shots

What was level 2 quality (basic)?
- Titles
- Mise-en-scene
- Holding a shot

What was level 1 quality (minimal)?
-
- n/a
-

General comments of what I really liked about this opening sequence are:
I like the general idea

General comments of what I thought could be improved about this opening sequence are:
Some shots could have been shot more steady

Overall, I would give this group level 3 because most of their work from the syllabus is within the level 3 bracket.

Overall, I would give this group a mark of 3



Year 12 Media Peer Assessment of Construction
My group done these together

Group 2: Mark, Awra, Simi



What was level 4 quality (excellent)?
- Titles
- Editing
- Transitions


What was level 3 quality (proficient)?
- Holding a shot
- Variety of shots
- Framing a shot

What was level 2 quality (basic)?
- Mise-en-scene
-
-

What was level 1 quality (minimal)?
-
- n/a
-

General comments of what I really liked about this opening sequence are:
The whole opening sequence was great i thought it was the best in the class

General comments of what I thought could be improved about this opening sequence are:
Variety of shots

Overall, I would give this group level 4 because most of their work from the syllabus is within the level 3 bracket.

Overall, I would give this group a mark of 4

Filming in the easter holiday

Me and Marian had to re film our opening sequence because certain parts were not working out.


In this video it contains me filming my personal shot and Marian filming me.

This is my groups very first draft of our opening sequence.



-We liked the walking scene however it should be a bit more slower to symbolize her depression.
-I also enjoyed the doing the point of view shots and thought they were done well.


-We didn't like the music because it doesn't go with the motion of the opening sequence.
-We thought that it would be a better idea for Samantha to be having an overdose instead of slitting her wrists.
-We think that the teacher scene needed more types of shots.

Today Peggy didn't come because she was ill however myself and Marian filmed the outside scene.

- It was a sunny day so it was a perfect day to film our outside scene.

- As Marian came all the way to my house we decided to film without Peggy.