Monday, 26 April 2010

Year 12 Media Peer Assessment of Construction
My group done these together

Group 1:Marina, Difya, Tracy



What was level 4 quality (excellent)?
- Framing a shot
- Edits
- Transition


What was level 3 quality (proficient)?
- Sound
- Holding a steady shot
- Variety of shots

What was level 2 quality (basic)?
- Titles
- Mise-en-scene
- Holding a shot

What was level 1 quality (minimal)?
-
- n/a
-

General comments of what I really liked about this opening sequence are:
I like the general idea

General comments of what I thought could be improved about this opening sequence are:
Some shots could have been shot more steady

Overall, I would give this group level 3 because most of their work from the syllabus is within the level 3 bracket.

Overall, I would give this group a mark of 3



Year 12 Media Peer Assessment of Construction
My group done these together

Group 2: Mark, Awra, Simi



What was level 4 quality (excellent)?
- Titles
- Editing
- Transitions


What was level 3 quality (proficient)?
- Holding a shot
- Variety of shots
- Framing a shot

What was level 2 quality (basic)?
- Mise-en-scene
-
-

What was level 1 quality (minimal)?
-
- n/a
-

General comments of what I really liked about this opening sequence are:
The whole opening sequence was great i thought it was the best in the class

General comments of what I thought could be improved about this opening sequence are:
Variety of shots

Overall, I would give this group level 4 because most of their work from the syllabus is within the level 3 bracket.

Overall, I would give this group a mark of 4

No comments:

Post a Comment